[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-developers] RAQ 4 Memory
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-developers] RAQ 4 Memory
- From: Gerald Waugh <gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Jul 8 11:09:00 2003
- List-id: Discussion Forum for developers on Sun Cobalt Networks products <cobalt-developers.list.cobalt.com>
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Harald Kapper wrote:
> > the final answer from one of our customer's raq4-boxes:
>
> > [root /root]# free -m
> total used free shared buffers cached
> > Mem: 948 436 512 181 265 77
> > -/+ buffers/cache: 93 854
> > Swap: 128 0 128
>
> When you boot up a RaQ with 1GB RAM it will tell you that
> It can not use 1GB memory and limits it to something like
> 860MB. Odd number I know, and I think it is 1024KB for MB.
>
> Also, there may be a problem with 'tag' RAM. "cache tag RAM"
> on the motherboard keeps track of a number of pages
> (64M, 256M, 512M) If a page falls outside this boundary,
> it will be fetched from main memory, even if the processor
> or board had the page in the L1/L2 cache. This can make the
> system run slower than it would with less RAM.
>
> I am not sure what the 'tag ram' cache size is on the RaQ MB.
> But, it may be a problem. Only testing with an application
> written for testing this will determine actual results.
>
> Also there is high-density RAM and low-density RAM,
> high-density is usually less expensive, and RaQs do
> not run well on high-density RAM.
>
> Another observation is that we have seen some RaQs appear
> to run well on 1GB RAM, but during an OS restore, using
> big drives, the format md4 (hda4) [big-partition] the RaQ
> would hang while calculating the inodes (lots of inodes on
> big disk) entries.
> Changing the RAM back to 512MB would allow the restore
> to progress without incident.
>
> So will a RaQ3/4 run on 1GB of RAM?
> It appears to, but is all OK?
>
I wanted to add to this for the archives.
We have tested RaQ3s and RaQ4s with 768MB RAM
one 512MB and one 256MB. They run FINE,
went through a restore with 80GB drives,
and never had and error.
So, our recommendation is to use 768MB
Gerald
--
http://frontstreetnetworks.com | http://store.raqware.com
Front Street Networks LLC, 229 Front Street, Ste.#C
New Haven, CT 06513-3203 | phone: +1-203-785-0699