Re: [cobalt-developers] RaQ replacements

[Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

rackAID wrote:

> I have worked extensively with Ensim and a fair amount with Plesk.  Both
> have short comming but are far easier to secure than a cobalt Raq.  Ensim is
> now much better about timely release of rpms for software that they have
> modified.  Plesk RPM versions are usually easy to maintain.  You just have
> to know what rpms are customized.

If you use either up2date or apt-get, you shouldn't have to know
anything; they both come configured to only install RPMs on the system. 
In our experience we've never had any problems with Plesk caused by
updating using up2date (RHN) or apt-get.

Jeff
-- 
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA  92517 US
Internet & Unix/Linux/Sun/Cobalt Consulting +1 909 778-9980
Our jblists address used on lists is for list email only
To contact us offlist: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html";