Re: [cobalt-developers] Buy Raq 4i or 550 ?

["Thomas W. Holt Jr." <twh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What is everyone's problem with the 550?  I've had a RaQ1 that was 
upgraded to a RaQ2 for ages.  We finally got in a 550 to replace the 
aging RaQ1/2.  I used the cmu to xfer all the sites.  Worked like a 
charm.  I've got close to 100 sites up and going on the 550.  My only 
problems so far are that I can't get FrontPage to turn on for any sites 
since my last BlueLinq update (not a biggie, I ususally try to talk 
people out of FP anyway.....though, if anyone knows a fix for this...I'm 
listening).  I was REALLY impressed with the SSL interface, lets you 
generate csr, import, export, self-sign...etc....and even supports 
chained CA's (so you can use the economically priced InstantSSL, certs 
from Comodo).

Things I wish I had, and may be makign packages for myself if I ever get 
the time:
	OpenLDAP 2 (1, is so ancient)
	SpamAssassin
	ClamAV Antivirus

Other than that and wishing that Sun would use Qmail and djbdns instead 
of sendmail and bind, I'm extremely happy.


Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions wrote:

> >Hi:
> >
> >I have raq4i and i think to buy one more, but i don't know if buy one
> >Raq 4 i or 550 for shared hosting.
> >
> >that they recommend to me?
> >
>
> Save yourself a lot of headaches and get a standard whitebox :-)