RE: [cobalt-developers] New webalizer pkg on pkg.nl.cobalt.com

["Joe" <my_hidden_email@xxxxxxxxx>]

I for one believe in moving forward, not staying the same.

There is a different in the Cobalt Raq3 and 4 compared to this
software.  To upgrade to a new Cobalt Raq 4 you would have to
shell out more money.

The Webalizer software on the other hand is FREE!  Why not use
the new version?

Taco, don't get me wrong here, I think you do awsome work
and I appreciate it very much.

AKA Joe!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobalt-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cobalt-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Michael Hooper
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:26 AM
> To: cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-developers] New webalizer pkg on 
> pkg.nl.cobalt.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> > Why not just put the Webalizer 2.01 there?  Why waste time 
> with this 
> > older
> version?   There is already a 2.01 version at
> > http://cobalt-aid.sourceforge.net/files/
> 
> 1. Because if you install 2.01 you will loose all prior stats 
> of that month 2. Because the version on cobalt-aid is not 
> based on rpms 3. Because people had a broken 1.3, I fixed the 1.3
> 
> How would you react if Cobalt said 'there is a bug in the raq 
> 3, we are not going to fix it, you'll have to buy a raq 4' ?
> 
> We will hopefully release a pkg version of the 2.01 version 
> soon as well. It is however impossible upgrade without losing 
> stats for the running month. Therefore you'd best install 
> 2.01 on the first of any month.
> 
> With regards,
> 
> Taco Scargo
> 
> I see your point Taco, however I am one who has V2.01 and my 
> stats stopped. So, apparently it wasn't just 1.3 that was 
> flawed. I look forward to seeing the new version patched soon.
> 
> Thanks for everything.
> 
> Mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-developers mailing list 
> cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt> -developers
>