[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-developers] Qpopper & PAM
- Subject: [cobalt-developers] Qpopper & PAM
- From: Frostie Sprout <Frostie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Mar 21 12:35:18 2001
- List-id: Discussion Forum for developers on Cobalt Networks products <cobalt-developers.list.cobalt.com>
Why does Qpopper with PAM support use, on average, 10 times the CPU that
Qpopper without PAM support does?
I've tested this one quite extensively and I'm sure that the PAM support is
causing the problem but I can't think of any reason why QPOP+PAM would have
such a large hit on the CPU.
--
Frostie Sprout
Vice President - Technology
wyoming.com LLC
(307) 856-6400