[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-developers] Limit for recipients.
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-developers] Limit for recipients.
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Jan 10 09:20:45 2000
At 09:07 PM 1/7/00 Ariel Manzur wrote:
Hi.
I'm writting this perl script that sends e-mails, and I'm opening sendmail
using open(MAIL, "|/usr/bin/sendmail -t");
Is there any limit for the "To:" "CC" and "Bcc" fields? (I remember the
command line had a limit, but I'm using "sendmail -t").
The definitive sendmail documentation, "Sendmail", written by Brian
Costales and Eric Allman (the same guy who wrote the sendmail program),
published by O'Reilly, says nothing about a limitation.
In fact, the documentation for the -t switch implies no limitation,
sendmail reads the "To:", "Cc:" and "Bcc:" addresses one by one and sends
out the emails. However, as I've read (somewhere) that sendmail can bunch
mail going to the same server, we must presume a limitation based on
available memory, until proven otherwise.
Can I send a mail with like 1MB of "to:"?
Maybe. That said, you must of course remember the limitation of the
receiving MUA if you want your email delivered. With "Bcc:" this is not
important; the contents of the "Bcc:" field do not get delivered to the
recipients inside the email. However, the contents of the "To:" and the
"Cc:" fields do get delivered with the mail. So there are two
questions: Can your recipients' MUAs handle such long "To:" and "Cc:" fields?
Maybe. That said, would your intended recipients scroll through a megabyte
of headers to see what message you had at the bottom? I know I wouldn't,
but that's not nearly as important to you as whether or not your recipients
would. So the question remains, would they?
Maybe.
That said, do you really want to give each of your recipients your entire
mailing list of email addresses? They'd certainly be visible to
everyone. If only one of the people on the list is a spammer (and
presuming your not, with so many addresses in your "To:" field), you'd have
just given them a pretty good sized list.
So all in all, I'd have to say: NOT A GOOD IDEA. (capitals intentional)
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net
<jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<www.nobaloney.net>, <www.mailtraqna.com>, <www.email-lists.com>